ISSN: 2545-2533     choose language:  

2025; 8(2): 1-11

DOI: 10.32114/CCI.2025.8.2.1.11
Published online: 2025-06-30 (first online 2025-03-24)

Mislabeled out-of-hospital patient care records during transitions of care: a quality improvement intervention using root cause analysis (RCA) in an EMS system.


Luis Mauricio Pinet-Peralta [1] , Nicole Y. Duppins [2] .

[1] University of Maryland School of Medicine, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
[2] Prince George’s County Fire/EMS, McCormick Drive, Largo Maryland, United States.



    Abstract:


Abstract [EN]   - INTRODUCTION: Out-of-hospital emergency care has developed dramatically and grown more complex in the last decade. Transfer of care between out-of-hospital clinicians and the emergency department (ED) staff drives the connection to the healthcare system. Across the US, this process is highly variable and not standardized, which may lead to adverse events. The purpose of this quality study is to identify the cause of mislabeled EMS patient care reports in an EMS agency and develop an intervention to reduce the rate of mislabeled patient care reports. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This quality improvement study follows the model for improvement process, using PDCA cycles and root cause analysis, and used the two-sample unmatched Wilcoxon rank-sum to test for differences in the number of mislabeled records after intervention implementation. RESULTS: Before the intervention, the receiving facilities identified a total of 75 mislabeled ePCR. After implementation of the facility code changes, the receiving facilities identified a reduction in the number of mislabeled ePCRs received from Agency E, from 37 in January to 14 in April. This change represents a 37.83% (z=-10.583, p=0.000) reduction in the number of mislabeled ePCRs, although the EMS Agency E still accounts for the largest proportion of mislabeled records with more than 70%, even after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: A considerable number of mislabeled records (65%) remain unexplained by the technological factors identified in the PDCA Root Cause Analysis approach. Other factors, including human factors and other technological factors not addressed in this study, which may require validation rules, may still be contributing to mislabeled EMS records.

Streszczenie [PL]   - WSTĘP: Opieka doraźna poza szpitalem rozwinęła się dynamicznie i stała się bardziej złożona w ciągu ostatniej dekady. Przekazywanie opieki na pacjentem między lekarzami poza szpitalem a personelem oddziału ratunkowego (ED) wymaga połączenia systemów opieki zdrowotnej. W całych Stanach Zjednoczonych proces ten jest bardzo zmienny i nieustandaryzowany, co może prowadzić do zdarzeń niepożądanych. Celem tego badania jest zidentyfikowanie przyczyny błędnie oznaczonych raportów opieki nad pacjentami pogotowia ratunkowego (EMS) i opracowanie interwencji w celu zmniejszenia liczby błędnie oznaczonych raportów opieki nad pacjentami. MATERIAŁY I METODY: To badanie poprawy jakości podąża za modelem procesu doskonalenia, wykorzystując cykle PDCA i analizę przyczyn źródłowych, wykorzystano dwupróbkową sumę rang Wilcoxona do przetestowania różnic w liczbie błędnie oznaczonych rekordów po wdrożeniu interwencji. WYNIKI: Przed interwencją placówki odbiorcze zidentyfikowały łącznie 75 błędnie oznaczonych ePCR. Po wprowadzeniu zmian w kodach placówek, placówki odbiorcze odnotowały zmniejszenie liczby błędnie oznakowanych ePCR otrzymanych od Agencji, z 37 w styczniu do 14 w kwietniu. Zmiana ta oznacza zmniejszenie liczby błędnie oznakowanych ePCR o 37,83% (z=-10,583, p=0,000), chociaż Agencja EMS nadal odpowiada za największą część błędnie oznakowanych rekordów, przekraczającą 70%, nawet po interwencji. WNIOSKI: Znaczna liczba błędnie oznakowanych rekordów (65%) pozostaje niewyjaśniona przez czynniki technologiczne zidentyfikowane w podejściu PDCA. Inne czynniki, w tym czynniki ludzkie i inne czynniki technologiczne nieuwzględnione w tym badaniu, które mogą wymagać reguł walidacji, mogą nadal przyczyniać się do błędnie oznakowanych rekordów EMS.

    Citation:


VANCOUVER FORMAT

Pinet-Peralta LM, Duppins NY. Mislabeled out-of-hospital patient care records during transitions of care: a quality improvement intervention using root cause analysis (RCA) in an EMS system. Crit. Care Innov. 2025; 8(2): 1-11.
DOI: 10.32114/CCI.2025.8.2.1.11


    Download article (PDF file): click here



    Read article:





    Additional materials:


No files


    References:


[1] Sasser S, Varghese M, Kellermann A, Lormand JD., Ed., Prehospital trauma care systems. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2005.
| (WWW) |

[2] Lang ED, Spaite DW, Oliver ZJ, Gotschall CS, Swor RA, Dawson DE, et al.. A National Model for Developing, Implementing, and Evaluating Evidence‐based Guidelines for Prehospital Care. Acad Emerg Med 2012; 19(2): 201–209.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[3] Cimino J, Braun C. Clinical Research in Prehospital Care: Current and Future Challenges. Clin Pract. 2023; 13(5): 1266–1285.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[4] Takoutsing BD, Zolo Y. Developing a prehospital care service in a low‐resource setting: Barriers and solutions. Health Sci Rep. 2023; 6(11): e1719.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[5] Delaney PG, Moussally J, Wachira BW. Future directions for emergency medical services development in lowand middle-income countries. Surgery 2024; 1769(1): 220–222.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[6] Sanjuan-Quiles Á, Hernández-Ramón MDP, Juliá-Sanchis R, García-Aracil N, Castejón-de La Encina ME, Perpiñá-Galvañ J. Handover of Patients From Prehospital Emergency Services to Emergency Departments: A Qualitative Analysis Based on Experiences of Nurses. J Nurs Care Qual. 2019; 34(2): 169–174.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[7] O’Connor L, Hall M, Smiley A, Richardson J, McCluskey A, Duftonet J, et al.. Implementation of Integrated Electronic Health Record Access for Prehospital Clinicians. Am J Emerg Med. 2024; 74: 182–184.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[8] Greene J. EMS and Information Sharing. Ann Emerg Med. 2014; 64(2): A15–A17.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | Scholar Google |

[9] American College of Emergency Physicians. Transfer of patient care between EMS providers and receiving facilities. 2019.
| (WWW) |

[10] National Trends in Hospital and Physician Adoption of Electronic Health Records. ASTP. 2021.
| (WWW) |

[11] Porter A, Badshah A, Black S, Fitzpatrick D, Harris-Mayes R, Islam S, et al.. Electronic health records in ambulances: the ERA multiple-methods study. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2020.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[12] Alonso V, Vasco Santos J, Pinto M, Ferreira J, Lema I, Lopes F, et al.. Problems and Barriers during the Process of Clinical Coding: a Focus Group Study of Coders’ Perceptions. J Med Syst. 2020; 44(3): 62.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[13] Cheng P, Gilchrist A, Robinson KM, Paul L. The risk and consequences of clinical miscoding due to inadequate medical documentation: a case study of the impact on health services funding. Health Inf.Manag. 2009; 38(1): 35–46.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[14] Troyer L, Brady W. Barriers to effective EMS to emergency department information transfer at patient handover: A systematic review. Am J Emerg Med. 2020; 38(7): 1494–1503.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[15] Laudermilch DJ, Schiff MA, Nathens AB, Rosengart MR. Lack of Emergency Medical Services Documentation Is Associated with Poor Patient Outcomes: A Validation of Audit Filters for Prehospital Trauma Care. J Am Coll Surg. 2010; 210(2): 220–227.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[16] Mears GD, Rosamond WD, Lohmeier C, Murphy C, O'Brien E, Asimos AW, et al.. A Link to Improve Stroke Patient Care: A Successful Linkage Between a Statewide Emergency Medical Services Data System and a Stroke Registry. Acad Emerg Med. 2010; 17(12): 1398–1404.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[17] Hagiwara MA, Magnusson C, Herlitz J, Seffel E, Axelsson C, Munters M, et al.. Adverse events in prehospital emergency care: a trigger tool study. BMC Emerg Med. 219; 19(1): 14.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[18] Bledsoe B, Wasden C, Johnson L. Electronic Prehospital Records are Often Unavailable for Emergency Department Medical Decision Making. West J Emerg Med. 2013; 14(5): 482–488.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[19] Pinet Peralta LM. The prehospital emergency care system in Mexico City: a system's performance evaluation. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2006; 21(2): 104-111.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[20] Staff T, Søvik S. A retrospective quality assessment of pre-hospital emergency medical documentation in motor vehicle accidents in south-eastern Norway. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2011; 19(1): 20.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[21] Abir M, Taymour RK, Goldstick JE, Malsberger R, Forman J, Hammondet S, et al.. Data missingness in the Michigan NEMSIS (MI-EMSIS) dataset: a mixed-methods study. Int J Emerg Med. 2021; 14(1): 22.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | Scholar Google |

[22] Waldron R, Sixsmith D. Emergency Physician Awareness of Prehospital Procedures and Medications. West J Emerg Med. 2014; 15(4): 504–510.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[23] Lubin JS, Shah A. An Incomplete Medical Record: Transfer of Care From Emergency Medical Services to the Emergency Department. Cureus 2022; 14(2): e22446.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[24] Hakimzada AF, Green RA, Sayan OR, Zhang J, Patel VL. The nature and occurrence of registration errors in the emergency department. Int J Med Inform. 2008; 77(3): 169–175.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[25] Neeki MM, Dong F, Avera L, Than T, Borger R, Powell J, et al.. Alternative Destination Transport? The Role of Paramedics in Optimal Use of the Emergency Department. West J Emerg Med. 2016; 17(6): 690–697.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[26] Magnusson C, Axelsson C, Nilsson L, Strömsöe A, Munters M, Herlitz J, et al..The final assessment and its association with field assessment in patients who were transported by the emergency medical service. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018; 26(1): 111.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[27] Maddry JK, Arana AA, Clemons MA, Medellin KL, Shults NM, Perez CA, et al.. Impact of a Standardized EMS Handoff Tool on Inpatient Medical Record Documentation at a Level I Trauma Center. Prehosp Emerg Care. 2021; 25(5): 656–663.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

[28] Ogrinc G, Davies L, Goodman D, Batalden P, Davidoff F, Stevens D. SQUIRE 2.0 Standards for Quality Improvement Reporting Excellence: Revised publication guidelines from a detailed consensus process. BMJ Qual Saf. 2016; 25(12): 986-992.
| Digital Object Identifier (DOI) | PubMed (NCBI) | Scholar Google |

SEND

submitarticle

Send the manuscript online via the www.irdim.net platform
INFO

forauthors

We invite you to read the instructions for authors
READ

allissues

>>
We invite you to read the instructions for authors